Current:Home > reviewsPrince Harry Loses High Court Challenge Over Paying for His Own Security in the U.K.-VaTradeCoin
Prince Harry Loses High Court Challenge Over Paying for His Own Security in the U.K.
lotradecoin liquidity provider benefits View Date:2024-12-26 10:53:47
Prince Harry is facing a royal setback in his quest for protection.
London's High Court has ruled against the Duke of Sussex on May 23 over his attempt to pay for his own security when he's in the U.K.
After he and wife Meghan Markle stepped back from their royal duties amid their move to America in 2020, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex lost access to police security that usually accompanies royal members. Now, according to Reuters, the High Court in London has ruled his lawyers could not move forward with a judicial review that would explore whether he could pay for the protective agents himself.
The decision to take away publicly-funded security was made by the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures, also known as RAVEC. And according to the BBC, Judge Martin Chamberlain said in his ruling said that RAVEC was not incorrect in their decision that allowing payment for protection would be against public interest.
E! News has reached out to Harry's reps for comment and have not heard back.
The ruling comes less than one week after Harry, Meghan and her mom Doria Ragland were involved in a "near catastrophic car chase" with "highly aggressive paparazzi," per the couple's rep, after attending a gala in NYC on May 16.
After the incident, authorities also addressed the situation, telling E! News in a statement, "There were numerous photographers that made their transport challenging. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex arrived at their destination and there were no reported collisions, summonses, injuries, or arrests in regard."
Get the latest tea from inside the palace walls. Sign up for Royal Recap!veryGood! (86)
Related
- I loved to hate pop music, until Chappell Roan dragged me back
- Stanford University president to resign following research controversy
- Inside Clean Energy: What Happens When Solar Power Gets Much, Much Cheaper?
- Jack Daniel's v. poop-themed dog toy in a trademark case at the Supreme Court
- We can't get excited about 'Kraven the Hunter.' Don't blame superhero fatigue.
- As Lake Powell Hits Landmark Low, Arizona Looks to a $1 Billion Investment and Mexican Seawater to Slake its Thirst
- New York Community Bank agrees to buy a large portion of Signature Bank
- Who are the Hunter Biden IRS whistleblowers? Joseph Ziegler, Gary Shapley testify at investigation hearings
- American who says he crossed into Syria on foot is freed after 7 months in detention
- Inside Clean Energy: Indian Point Nuclear Plant Reaches a Contentious End
Ranking
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Dropping Hints
- Ray Lewis' Son Ray Lewis III Laid to Rest in Private Funeral
- Judge to decide in April whether to delay prison for Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes
- Locals look for silver linings as Amazon hits pause on its new HQ
- Sabrina Carpenter Shares Her Self
- Ford recalls 1.5 million vehicles over problems with brake hoses and windshield wipers
- Stock market today: Global markets mixed after Chinese promise to support economy
- Las Vegas Delta flight cancelled after reports of passengers suffering heat-related illness
Recommendation
-
Travis Kelce Praises Taylor Swift For Making Eras Tour "Best In The World"
-
It's impossible to fit 'All Things' Ari Shapiro does into this headline
-
Amazon is cutting another 9,000 jobs as tech industry keeps shrinking
-
Unchecked Oil and Gas Wastewater Threatens California Groundwater
-
Stock market today: Asian shares advance, tracking rally on Wall Street
-
Inside Clean Energy: What Happens When Solar Power Gets Much, Much Cheaper?
-
In Glasgow, COP26 Negotiators Do Little to Cut Emissions, but Allow Oil and Gas Executives to Rest Easy
-
Stock market today: Global markets mixed after Chinese promise to support economy